Planning

1 slide- music: Angels- Y no se que paso... If I had a chance
2 slide-I'd show you how much I love you
3 slide- How much I care,
4 slide- And how much you mean to me.
5 slide- new song: LU- La vida despues de ti... If I had chance,
6 slide- I wouldn't ever leave you again,
7 slide: I would stay by you forever,
8 slide- No matter what.
9 slide- new song: El mundo detras- RBD (starting from 0:55) If I had a chance,
10 slide- I'd buy you all your favourite chocolates,
11 slide- I'd lay by your side,
12 slide- And whisper "I love you".
13 slide- Music: Anahi- como cada dia...If I had a chance,
14 slide- I'd run away with you on a lost island,
15 slide- Music- inalcanzable by RBD... We'd walk along the shore holding hands,
16 slide- And have long sweet talks.
17 slide- If I had a chance,
18 slide- To go back in time,
19 slide- I'd shout out to the whole universe, "I LOVE YOU!"
20 slide-David Bisbal- digale... But now it's too late...

Testing MMP

Before you start doing your Design, you should devise appropriate test for your MMP. How would you know that your MM poem is effective and of appropriate quality?

I would ask the people around me, and the teacher just to make sure that it's ok.

Design Specification

*My poem has been approved by Mrs. V.

*I still don't know how long will my video last, when I get the pictures and the music chosen... I'll see. I probably won't last longer than 3 mins.

*I'll choose images that will match with my poem, since it's a love song, and it's sad I won't use effects as much... the resolution will by high, and ofcourse in the end, I will do copyright and write down where I got my music from and the pictures, from what site... etc.

*I will write one line per slide.

*I will use some catchy font, probably colours black and pink :)

*I will use different transitions for each slide, image..

*I will write a list of songs that I think go with the song, I still don't know which ones exactly.. but I'll let you know ;)

2 Best media poetry's of my choice

I liked best Ana Buling's, and Andrea Jovanovic's media poetry's. I liked how the the pictures and the music go with the poem, the viewer can clearly see and feel what the writer is showing.

Poetry video

Video poetry is a mixed media format in which poem, image and sound interact symbiotically. The motif of this is to show the poem more effectively than then poem in general. Good video poetry unifies the poem, images and the music into art. the music also has to go with the poem and image.Chicago and San Franciso organize festivals where poetry video is major element, this is how the public can really get into the poetry. Video poetry also provides a format that students can as as for representing their themes for a short video.

http://www.datawranglers.com/voices/poetryvideo/

If I had a chance- my poem

If I had a chance,
I'd show you how much I love you,
How much I care,
And how much you mean to me.

If I had chance,
I wouldn't ever leave you again,
I would stay by you forever,
No matter what.

If I had a chance,
I'd buy you all your favourite chocolates,
I'd lay by your side,
And whisper "I love you".

If I had a chance,
I'd run away with you on a lost island,
We'd walk along the shore holding hands,
And have long sweet talks.

If I had a chance,
To go back in time,
I'd shout out to the whole universe, "I LOVE YOU!"
But now it's too late...

What is web 2.0?

The bursting of the dot-com bubble in the fall of 2001 marked a turning point for the web. Many people concluded that the web was overhyped, when in fact bubbles and consequent shakeouts appear to be a common feature of all technological revolutions. Shakeouts typically mark the point at which an ascendant technology is ready to take its place at center stage. The pretenders are given the bum's rush, the real success stories show their strength, and there begins to be an understanding of what separates one from the other.

The concept of "Web 2.0" began with a conference brainstorming session between O'Reilly and MediaLive International. Dale Dougherty, web pioneer and O'Reilly VP, noted that far from having "crashed", the web was more important than ever, with exciting new applications and sites popping up with surprising regularity. What's more, the companies that had survived the collapse seemed to have some things in common. Could it be that the dot-com collapse marked some kind of turning point for the web, such that a call to action such as "Web 2.0" might make sense? We agreed that it did, and so the Web 2.0 Conference was born.

In the year and a half since, the term "Web 2.0" has clearly taken hold, with more than 9.5 million citations in Google. But there's still a huge amount of disagreement about just what Web 2.0 means, with some people decrying it as a meaningless marketing buzzword, and others accepting it as the new conventional wisdom.

This article is an attempt to clarify just what we mean by Web 2.0.

In our initial brainstorming, we formulated our sense of Web 2.0 by example:

Web 1.0		Web 2.0
DoubleClick	-->	Google AdSense
Ofoto	-->	Flickr
Akamai	-->	BitTorrent
mp3.com	-->	Napster
Britannica Online	-->	Wikipedia
personal websites	-->	blogging
evite	-->	upcoming.org and EVDB
domain name speculation	-->	search engine optimization
page views	-->	cost per click
screen scraping	-->	web services
publishing	-->	participation
content management systems	-->	wikis
directories (taxonomy)	-->	tagging ("folksonomy")
stickiness	-->	syndication

The list went on and on. But what was it that made us identify one application or approach as "Web 1.0" and another as "Web 2.0"? (The question is particularly urgent because the Web 2.0 meme has become so widespread that companies are now pasting it on as a marketing buzzword, with no real understanding of just what it means. The question is particularly difficult because many of those buzzword-addicted startups are definitely not Web 2.0, while some of the applications we identified as Web 2.0, like Napster and BitTorrent, are not even properly web applications!) We began trying to tease out the principles that are demonstrated in one way or another by the success stories of web 1.0 and by the most interesting of the new applications.

1. The Web As Platform

Like many important concepts, Web 2.0 doesn't have a hard boundary, but rather, a gravitational core. You can visualize Web 2.0 as a set of principles and practices that tie together a veritable solar system of sites that demonstrate some or all of those principles, at a varying distance from that core.

Figure 1 shows a "meme map" of Web 2.0 that was developed at a brainstorming session during FOO Camp, a conference at O'Reilly Media. It's very much a work in progress, but shows the many ideas that radiate out from the Web 2.0 core.

For example, at the first Web 2.0 conference, in October 2004, John Battelle and I listed a preliminary set of principles in our opening talk. The first of those principles was "The web as platform." Yet that was also a rallying cry of Web 1.0 darling Netscape, which went down in flames after a heated battle with Microsoft. What's more, two of our initial Web 1.0 exemplars, DoubleClick and Akamai, were both pioneers in treating the web as a platform. People don't often think of it as "web services", but in fact, ad serving was the first widely deployed web service, and the first widely deployed "mashup" (to use another term that has gained currency of late). Every banner ad is served as a seamless cooperation between two websites, delivering an integrated page to a reader on yet another computer. Akamai also treats the network as the platform, and at a deeper level of the stack, building a transparent caching and content delivery network that eases bandwidth congestion.

Nonetheless, these pioneers provided useful contrasts because later entrants have taken their solution to the same problem even further, understanding something deeper about the nature of the new platform. Both DoubleClick and Akamai were Web 2.0 pioneers, yet we can also see how it's possible to realize more of the possibilities by embracing additional Web 2.0 design patterns.

Let's drill down for a moment into each of these three cases, teasing out some of the essential elements of difference.